2025 ARMORTEK KIT SURVEY

Over the last few years we have brought out a whole series of kits as a direct result of your feedback - kits like the Pershing, JagdPanther, Hetzer, Leopard 2A4, and more recently the Sd Kfz 7, 88mm Flak 36 and the upcoming Challenger 2.

So, in keeping with what has become and annual tradition, here is your opportunity to once again influence our future production plans.

We have added in some "guide pricing" next to the names of the models. This is a rough estimate of the price at the current rates.

Thanks in advance for your input and we look forward to the results.

Tiger I Adjustable Suspension

Forum for Armortek Owners to Meet, chat and share knowledge. You are advised to check 'official advice' before carrying out any modifications.
Post Reply
Simon Peck
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:24 am
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 46 times

Tiger I Adjustable Suspension

Post by Simon Peck »

I’m not sure when, but at some point Armortek went from fixed suspension to ‘adjustable’, where the fixed end of the torsion bars are fed into a ‘fixed end’ (CE0270, CE0271) held tightly from outside the hull side. But in addition to these fixings, there is also a means of clamping screws onto the ‘fixed end’. This clamp/fixing seems to have moved over different production batches from being mounted above, mounted below, and mounted both above and below. My question: why is it there if the suspension is adjustable? By having it there, it seems to revert back to the earlier fixed type. can anyone share their experience? Thanks.

User avatar
Adrian Harris
Posts: 5119
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Berkshire (UK)
Has liked: 1475 times
Been liked: 1674 times

Re: Tiger I Adjustable Suspension

Post by Adrian Harris »

Once the correct suspension arm angle has been set, the vertical screw simply holds the "fixed" end in place until the main retaining screw is tightened down fully. It also provides a little extra clamping force.

Adrian.
Contact me at sales@armortekaddict.uk for details of my smoker fan control module

Simon Peck
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:24 am
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 46 times

Re: Tiger I Adjustable Suspension

Post by Simon Peck »

Thanks Adrian, but why has their position (above or below) and at times number (above and below) changed? Surely from above (inside the hull) would be better than from below, (extra holes in hull floor).

User avatar
Adrian Harris
Posts: 5119
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Berkshire (UK)
Has liked: 1475 times
Been liked: 1674 times

Re: Tiger I Adjustable Suspension

Post by Adrian Harris »

Only the designers can say exactly why the screws are where they are.

Depending on the layout, getting at them from the inside can be difficult due to the batteries, electronics etc, plus the ones at the front sometimes end up under the motor mounts.

Getting at them from the outside would mean raising the tank high enough to be able to get tools, hands etc underneath to be able to adjust them, plus, as you say, they result in more holes and extra waterproofing.

Adrian.
Contact me at sales@armortekaddict.uk for details of my smoker fan control module

Vince Cutajar
Posts: 2193
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Malta
Has liked: 790 times
Been liked: 1761 times

Re: Tiger I Adjustable Suspension

Post by Vince Cutajar »

All I can say is that on mine they were at the bottom and I changed them to be at the top. It was more convenient for me. I used allen head bolts except for the two at the front which where close to the motor mounts. For these I used hex head bolts.

Vince

Post Reply