2025 ARMORTEK KIT SURVEY

Over the last few years we have brought out a whole series of kits as a direct result of your feedback - kits like the Pershing, JagdPanther, Hetzer, Leopard 2A4, and more recently the Sd Kfz 7, 88mm Flak 36 and the upcoming Challenger 2.

So, in keeping with what has become and annual tradition, here is your opportunity to once again influence our future production plans.

We have added in some "guide pricing" next to the names of the models. This is a rough estimate of the price at the current rates.

Thanks in advance for your input and we look forward to the results.

Paint

Forum for Armortek Owners to Meet, chat and share knowledge. You are advised to check 'official advice' before carrying out any modifications.
Post Reply
Simon Peck
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:24 am
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 46 times

Paint

Post by Simon Peck »

Hi all, I was wondering if there is any advantage from a corrosion/protection point of view (especially regarding steel) to using oil based paint as against water based paint? Cheers!

User avatar
Gerhard Michel
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:27 pm
Location: near Nuremberg, Germany
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 678 times

Re: Paint

Post by Gerhard Michel »

Hi Simon,

I don't think so. Please remember that most modern car manufacturers are using water based paint.
kind regards
Gerhard
____________________________________________________________________
1/6 Scale models: Jagdpanther (AT), Jagdtiger (BT), Königstiger (Porsche turret, NH), Königstiger (Production turret, BT), Pz. IV (SH)

Simon Peck
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:24 am
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 46 times

Re: Paint

Post by Simon Peck »

Hi Gerhard,

Thanks for the reply. I agree ref most modern car manufacturers and water based paints. But most modern cars are now aluminium and plastic, and any steel used probably has some sort of corrosion resistance in the alloy. If nothing else, I wonder if enamel paint ‘sticks’ to steel better than acrylic?

Best regards,

Simon

Steve Stuart
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:34 pm
Location: Oxford
Has liked: 263 times
Been liked: 192 times

Re: Paint

Post by Steve Stuart »

The issue is that modern paints have to conform to modern standards for the types of volatile, environmentally damaging materials they might emit during any dry or curing process. It does not mean that in actual fact, that a modern acrylic paint is actually better in terms of its adhesion, durability in terms of its abrasion or impact resistance, nor its resistance to any ageing processes it may be susceptible. Cynically, with my involvement in the cycle trade, old fashioned stove enamelling seems to be a hell of a lot more robust than modern finishes, which seem to be far more fragile.
We have to make do with what is available, water based paints, in someways may well be more simple to manage with out organic solvents. I don't necessarily think they are better, just easier. I prefer to keep with enamels for the moment as I think that they may be more robust.
Something that is also important is that you may have a greater affinity for one type of material than another, and so for you that medium works best, so that at the end of the day may be the best reason to choose one over the other 8) .
Steve

Post Reply