Re: David's carrier build.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:34 am
Hi Phil, the problem with a braking system on the Carrier is that, because it has a differential system, not only does it have to provide sufficient force to slow down the track that it is applying the braking force to, it also has to supply sufficient force to accelerate the track on the older side. This is because any reduction in speed on one side has to be matched with an increase in speed on the other side, or a reduction in the speed of the drive motor.
I have tried to design a braking system for the Carrier, and have made one work, but the wear rate on the pads in the braking system have provided to be higher than is acceptable, so regular adjustment was required.
You will probably need to redesign the servo operating mechanism so that greater force can be applied by the servo motor to the braking system, again this I have done and achieved a increase in force at a ratio of 3:1, (3 times the rated servo force at the pads) which greatly increased the force available but it has a down side that to achieve the greater force there is a reduction in the movement available, which again due to the wear rate of the pads and the reduced available movement of the operating system, regular adjustment is required.
To achieve the required adjustment mentioned above, my design required the removal of the back axle and this is not a simple process as it requires the removal of the 16 nuts and bolts holding it in.
If you manage to find a solution to this problem please let us know as I would prefer to have the original differential system running on the Carrier as I have had to resort to running it with two motors and gearboxes across the back which enables it to run well but ruins the appearance of the vehicle.
David
I have tried to design a braking system for the Carrier, and have made one work, but the wear rate on the pads in the braking system have provided to be higher than is acceptable, so regular adjustment was required.
You will probably need to redesign the servo operating mechanism so that greater force can be applied by the servo motor to the braking system, again this I have done and achieved a increase in force at a ratio of 3:1, (3 times the rated servo force at the pads) which greatly increased the force available but it has a down side that to achieve the greater force there is a reduction in the movement available, which again due to the wear rate of the pads and the reduced available movement of the operating system, regular adjustment is required.
To achieve the required adjustment mentioned above, my design required the removal of the back axle and this is not a simple process as it requires the removal of the 16 nuts and bolts holding it in.
If you manage to find a solution to this problem please let us know as I would prefer to have the original differential system running on the Carrier as I have had to resort to running it with two motors and gearboxes across the back which enables it to run well but ruins the appearance of the vehicle.
David