Suspension arm angle

Forum for discussion relating to the Panzer III/StuG III
Post Reply
User avatar
Oli Dainton
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:41 pm
Been liked: 18 times

Suspension arm angle

Post by Oli Dainton »

Hi

I have just got my Panzer III on it’s wheel for the first time with just two drive motors installed and no upper hull at all.

I notice that the front two arms are almost horizontal with just this weight, while the rest of the arms sitting closer to 10 degrees.

Question for all Panzer III owners with added option packs:

Did you install arms at 20 degrees as per manual or should I have added some additional degrees to account for Ll the additional electronics weight?

If possible what angle are your suspension arms when on wheels at full weight?

Since I have flattened ends of torsion bar fittings to get better purchase on grub screws I am concerned I may need to order a new set if 20 is actually insufficient..
Thanks
Oli

User avatar
Tom Miller
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 9:23 pm
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Been liked: 315 times

Re: Suspension arm angle

Post by Tom Miller »

I increased the angle to 25 degrees on mine. I figured I would rather have the tank ride a little hi than too low.
Tom

Stephen White
Site Admin
Posts: 3100
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Dorset
Has liked: 983 times
Been liked: 2047 times
Contact:

Re: Suspension arm angle

Post by Stephen White »

Oil, you might like to have a look at my Pz III build thread here:

http://www.armortek.co.uk/Forum3b/viewt ... 4&start=15

I've just had another look and I'm surprised to see that I set mine at 40 deg. It will sit at a much lower angle with weight on, naturally.

With my Pz III, I did put it up on blocks if it wasn't going to be used for a while. That may have been overkill but it seemed to be sensible to give the torsion bars a rest. Never had any noticeable settling in the time I had her.

User avatar
Oli Dainton
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:41 pm
Been liked: 18 times

Re: Suspension arm angle

Post by Oli Dainton »

Thanks both - is frustrating to be instructed to set at 20 degrees when it seems this will be insufficient..
Thanks
Oli

LesBernell
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Westlake Village, Calif
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 34 times

Re: Suspension arm angle

Post by LesBernell »

I'm at the point of setting my Suspension Arm angle. The manual says 20 degrees. The consensus appears that 20 is too low. I have read suggestions of 25 to 40 degrees.
My question is: If you were doing it again, and considering that it would have all option packs, what would you set the angle at?
I appreciate your input.
Les

User avatar
Adrian Harris
Posts: 4918
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Berkshire (UK)
Has liked: 1210 times
Been liked: 1384 times

Re: Suspension arm angle

Post by Adrian Harris »

I'm not sure Armortek can win with this, as kits built to be static will sit too high if a fully weighted angle is given, and running kits will be too low if a static angle is given.

The manual for the first release Panzer III said 40 degrees, but that had a lot of steel floor and deck panels etc.
The manual for the first release Stug III said 30 to 40 degrees, and that had aluminium panels, as far as I recall.

The beauty of the adjustable suspension system is that you can set the angle, see how the tank rides, and fairly simply adjust it later if needed.

As long as you don't grind unnecessary flats into the components :roll: :roll:

Personally, if I were building a new release kit now, I'd set it at 30 degrees and see how it looks when loaded.

I have seen Panzer III kits running around which look like they're on stilts :lol: :lol:

Adrian.
Contact me at sales@armortekaddict.uk for details of my smoker fan control module

LesBernell
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:17 pm
Location: Westlake Village, Calif
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 34 times

Re: Suspension arm angle

Post by LesBernell »

I set the angle at 30 Degrees. It's coming along....
Attachments
Tank as of 10-09-2020.jpg

Post Reply