00 FD 96 John's Main Contender

Forum for discussion relating to the Chietain MBT
Post Reply
User avatar
John Clarke
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:06 pm
Location: Staffordshire
Been liked: 1719 times

Re: 00 FD 96 John's Main Contender

Post by John Clarke »

Hi Steve, Glad you like it, easy enough to do. I wanted ask, did you just file the horrible crease off on the turret top left hand side or did you fill or both.
Cracking job you made of it. (Pictured)
Elevation servo.
One of the aims of the idea was not to change the "Armortek" option too much, so that a return to the original supplied mechanism would be easy to adapt back. A bag of original parts already in the spares box. Plan B, if everything goes Pete Tong.
The gun barrel is not just heavy, but very long too as you know, and I felt thinning it to reduce weight could only weaken it. I don't have a lathe either :| . The lead counter weight is an extra 1.2kg to the original setup, it's a necessity to take the load off the servo. But then the fat servo itself has a lot less weight than the original mechanism and motor, so you could say it's probably only half the extra weight (600g) that's been added to the original set up.

I remember a discussion years back where some builders wanted to slim down the weight of their Armortek models, I wholly agree to disagree.
Why do we buy these monsters in the first place and not buy an alternative manufactures 3mm fibre glass model.
Up to 90mm of frontal turret armor, that's why. ( I do anyway) :lol:

I'm must emphasize I'm not expecting much from the new system, But I've had experience of the screw jack system in Centurion, Comet, KT and watched others, the whirring sound of the robust screw jack and slow speed mimics the hand operation of WW2 tanks very well but it doesn't compare to the actual powered action of an MBT gun elevation. this is my take on it.
The servo system I've fitted is not a very sophisticated system and should only work on the 90' frontal arc. I'm not going for accurate angles of gun elevation or depression, enough to show it works should be enough for most of it's time in use. The manual override control should allow clearance over the rear deck.

At the end of the day the main thing is not to damage anything with that bloody big gun.
IMG_1244.jpeg
Oh Man, I only ride em I don't know what makes them work,
Definatley an Anti-Social type

Steve Norris
Posts: 1224
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:42 am
Location: Manchester
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 688 times

Re: 00 FD 96 John's Main Contender

Post by Steve Norris »

Hi John
The crease was removed by a combination of a big file and filler, not to difficult to do but quite messy.
I don’t have access to a lathe to modify the barrel but I was thinking about replacing it with something lighter like a carbon fibre or fibreglass rod . Getting the right size may be a problem but I will see if I can find anything that will do the job.
With the weight of the turret as it is, adding or removing weight may not really make much of an overall difference so I will go the easiest route.
Working on the rear deck at the moment so the turret will have to wait before I do anything further with it.
Regards
Steve

User avatar
John Clarke
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:06 pm
Location: Staffordshire
Been liked: 1719 times

Re: 00 FD 96 John's Main Contender

Post by John Clarke »

Hi Steve, thanks for the info on the turret crease, it is the next job. Hopefully I can do the job as well as yours :D
The servo reverser arrived today, so I'll be trying that later on the recoil unit.
Oh Man, I only ride em I don't know what makes them work,
Definatley an Anti-Social type

Post Reply