Chieftain No. 34
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Evening everybody, finally started to some work on the internals, only the exhausts for now though. I didn't like the look of the white plastic so ratched out some copper pipe & fittings. The system is not totally soldered yet as I may need remove it/modify it at some stage.
Have a good evening all
Cheers Charles
Have a good evening all
Cheers Charles
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Hi again.
Just to say last since last post I have redone exhaust, didn't take long & less round the houses. Photo soon.
Charles
Just to say last since last post I have redone exhaust, didn't take long & less round the houses. Photo soon.
Charles
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
- Richard Goodwin
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:46 pm
- Has liked: 294 times
- Been liked: 291 times
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Nice work Charles. How about another pic?Charles A Stewart wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 8:51 pm
Just to say last since last post I have redone exhaust, didn't take long & less round the houses. Photo soon.
- John Clarke
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:06 pm
- Location: Staffordshire
- Been liked: 1789 times
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Nice plumbing. Nothing like polishing your copper pipes Charles.
I do think the shorter route the better and prefer plastic in this instance all improving thermal efficiency.
But ......there's nothing like seeing some shiny copper bits glinting though the louvers in the sunshine
I do think the shorter route the better and prefer plastic in this instance all improving thermal efficiency.
But ......there's nothing like seeing some shiny copper bits glinting though the louvers in the sunshine
Oh Man, I only ride em I don't know what makes them work,
Definatley an Anti-Social type
Definatley an Anti-Social type
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Thanks for the comments Gentlemen
John , "shiny copper through the engine louves...", you forgot to mention the bright ali & bass bits of the smoke unit.
So here is the result of the alteration, just don't look to closely at the soldering.
Some adjustments can be made but I will wait and see after a test of the system, at some point
I know I have a lot to learn building these things, but really enjoying the process, despite the hiccups along the way.
John , "shiny copper through the engine louves...", you forgot to mention the bright ali & bass bits of the smoke unit.
So here is the result of the alteration, just don't look to closely at the soldering.
Some adjustments can be made but I will wait and see after a test of the system, at some point
I know I have a lot to learn building these things, but really enjoying the process, despite the hiccups along the way.
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
- John Clarke
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:06 pm
- Location: Staffordshire
- Been liked: 1789 times
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Looks great Charles, certainly better looking than my home built effort which sits on a tray under bench waiting for that wonderful day when it splutters into life.
The wife's given me fair warning not to use it in the garden if she's put the washing out on the line.
Especially my special brew, 50% baby oil, 50% diesel for that authentic aroma.
I call it "Macho" Cough!
The wife's given me fair warning not to use it in the garden if she's put the washing out on the line.
Especially my special brew, 50% baby oil, 50% diesel for that authentic aroma.
I call it "Macho" Cough!
Oh Man, I only ride em I don't know what makes them work,
Definatley an Anti-Social type
Definatley an Anti-Social type
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Hi John. Thanks for input.
Remind me to be up wind when I am near your vehicle. I will try your mixture, we have been running Tesco baby oil on the running tanks, the garage smells "lovelerly". It is pretty windy here and what with all diesel vehicles & local farm traffic, who will notice .
Take care and have a good weekend.
Charles
Remind me to be up wind when I am near your vehicle. I will try your mixture, we have been running Tesco baby oil on the running tanks, the garage smells "lovelerly". It is pretty windy here and what with all diesel vehicles & local farm traffic, who will notice .
Take care and have a good weekend.
Charles
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Evening folks.
We are back to Pistenking winky pots ! I have taken the step of investing in some, certainly not cheap by the time you clear HMRC & a jack up from Parcel Force.
The way forward is with Richard's idea. Hi everybody in Germany hint hint .
I have this video of the dry fit and I am happy with it.
https://youtube.com/shorts/7hA2bLCC9AM?feature=share
Take care
Charles
We are back to Pistenking winky pots ! I have taken the step of investing in some, certainly not cheap by the time you clear HMRC & a jack up from Parcel Force.
The way forward is with Richard's idea. Hi everybody in Germany hint hint .
I have this video of the dry fit and I am happy with it.
https://youtube.com/shorts/7hA2bLCC9AM?feature=share
Take care
Charles
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
-
- Posts: 2185
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:43 pm
- Location: Malta
- Has liked: 775 times
- Been liked: 1741 times
- John Clarke
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:06 pm
- Location: Staffordshire
- Been liked: 1789 times
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Certainly looks the part Charles.
Just pleased I don't need one for my desired camo job in Canada.. Maybe I'll just make a dummy one and chuck in the commanders bin
Just pleased I don't need one for my desired camo job in Canada.. Maybe I'll just make a dummy one and chuck in the commanders bin
Oh Man, I only ride em I don't know what makes them work,
Definatley an Anti-Social type
Definatley an Anti-Social type
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Hi John/cheers Vince.
Yes, probably the cheapest option john.
Charles
Yes, probably the cheapest option john.
Charles
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
-
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:10 am
- Location: Guernsey, Channel Islands
- Has liked: 598 times
- Been liked: 145 times
- Charles A Stewart
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:26 pm
- Location: Cumbria
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 913 times
- Contact:
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Good evening all.
I hope you have all voted for the CVR(T), sorry snoozed off this afternoon, must of been dreaming. Anyway two good choices .
Post snooze, I continued with this weeks on & off tasking: engine hatches & commanders hatch. I built the engine louvres soon after receiving the kit but struggled to get them to fit properly. What a difference a year makes, I don't know why they were a struggle to fit It may have had something to do with a small(very small, honest) hammer
They now drop into place beautifully, although this is only a dry fit. They will have to be stripped down for painting & fitting of the mesh.
Take care and have a good weekend.
Charles
I hope you have all voted for the CVR(T), sorry snoozed off this afternoon, must of been dreaming. Anyway two good choices .
Post snooze, I continued with this weeks on & off tasking: engine hatches & commanders hatch. I built the engine louvres soon after receiving the kit but struggled to get them to fit properly. What a difference a year makes, I don't know why they were a struggle to fit It may have had something to do with a small(very small, honest) hammer
They now drop into place beautifully, although this is only a dry fit. They will have to be stripped down for painting & fitting of the mesh.
Take care and have a good weekend.
Charles
Chieftain No.34, functional. PKW IV (2002), operational. Panther G No.18 (2022), started, well some of it is. Series 1 4x4 No.28 and a Bailey Bridge.
- John Clarke
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:06 pm
- Location: Staffordshire
- Been liked: 1789 times
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Enjoying seeing the detail going on Charles, with so many castings/parts that could labelled up, there'd be enough reading material to install the model in the WC.
Recently found a casting mark on the glacis plate, difficult to see due to paint, denoting, well, it looks like a Soviet star or is it a Starfish, a makers mark?
I'm finding so many differences, local mods and the use of materials that don't seem to be standard. For example, I've noticed on many tanks the wading rail can be seen to have been cut away in areas around the rear deck. Presumably to aid drainage. Pity the poor driver during the rainy season.
Would anybody know if this sort mod have been done during service?
Recently found a casting mark on the glacis plate, difficult to see due to paint, denoting, well, it looks like a Soviet star or is it a Starfish, a makers mark?
I'm finding so many differences, local mods and the use of materials that don't seem to be standard. For example, I've noticed on many tanks the wading rail can be seen to have been cut away in areas around the rear deck. Presumably to aid drainage. Pity the poor driver during the rainy season.
Would anybody know if this sort mod have been done during service?
Oh Man, I only ride em I don't know what makes them work,
Definatley an Anti-Social type
Definatley an Anti-Social type
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 3:39 pm
- Location: Germany
- Has liked: 269 times
- Been liked: 324 times
Re: Chieftain No. 34
Hi John,
can you post photos or provide links showing the difference between a standard rail & one that has been cut-away ?
Mark
can you post photos or provide links showing the difference between a standard rail & one that has been cut-away ?
Mark